The Impact of Predatory Publishing in Academic Research: A General Review [El impacto de las publicaciones depredadoras en la investigación académica: Una revisión general]
Keywords:
Predatory journals, Pseudo-journals, Opportunistic journals, Open AccessAbstract
Scientists and researchers from universities have become the target of predatory journals over the last few years. These false journals use deceptive practices to victimize researchers by promising them a guaranteed acceptance of their research and ensuring both online and print publications. There is a persistent culture in the academic environment of “publish or perish” to climb the ladder in academic careers. Because of that, these predatory journals take advantage of the pressure’s academics have to publish to deceive and exploit them intentionally for their profit. Those journals are insatiably motivated by money. They market their services by sending emails to academicians, encouraging them to submit their research papers through them. However, submissions are not free; they charge the authors for services they do not provide, such as peer-review, proofreading, and quality assurance. The purpose of this narrative is to create awareness about predatory journals and increase the knowledge of who they are to prevent scholars’ scientific articles get lost in the limbo forever. Furthermore, academics should avoid the negative consequences of publishing their research in these so-called predatory journals when they are encouraged through emails to send their publications. Those publishers not only can take the scientist’s or universities’ money but also the researcher’s reputation.
Downloads
References
Anderson, R. 2019. Cabell’s predatory journal blacklist: An updated review [Online forum comment]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/05/01/cabells-predatory-journal-blacklist-an-updated-review/
Anderson, R. 2017. Cabell’s new predatory journal blacklist: A review. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/07/25/cabells-new-predatory-journal-blacklist-review/
Beall, J. . 2016, Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science31:1511-1513.
Beall, J. 2017, What I learned from predatory publishers. Research Integrity Corner: Special issue on predatory journals. Biochemia Medica. 27(2):273-278
Beall’s list all predatory journals and publishers (n.d.). Retrieved from https://bealllist.weebly.com/
Bailey, C. W. 2006, What is open access?, http://digital-scholarship.org/cwb/WhatIsOA.pdf
Borgman, C. L. 2007. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Butler, D. 2013a, The dark side of publishing. Nature: The Future of Publishing. Vol. 495, 433-435.
Butler, D. 2013b, Sham journals scam authors. Con artists are stealing the identities of real journals to cheat scientists out of publishing fees. https://www.nature.com/news/sham-journals-scam-authors-1.12681
Ferris, L. E. & Winker, M. A. 2017, Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journal. Biochemia Medica. 27(2):279-284.
Guedon, J-C. 2017. Open access: Toward the Internet of the mind. Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/open-access-toward-the-internet-of-the-mind
Greenblatt, D. J. & Bertino, J. S. 2018, Opportunistic journals in the clinical pharmacology space: A policy statement from the publications and public policy committees of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology. The American College of Clinical Pharmacology. 7(4):353-357.
Gunaydin, G. P. & Dogan, N. O. 2015, A growing threat for academicians: Fake and predatory journals. The Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine. 14: 94-96
Jiménez-Contreras, E. & Jiménez-Segura, J. J. 2016, Predatory Journal, a new scientific epidemic. Science and Nursing. 12(2):7-12
McGlynn, T. 2013. The evolution of pseudo journals. Dominguez Hill, CA: Small Pond Science.
Ojala, M. 2019, The impact of predatory publishing on business research. The Dollar Sign, 58-60.
Pond, B. B., Brown, S. D., Stewart, D. W., Roane, D. S., & Harirforoosh, S. 2019, Faculty applicants’ attempt to inflate CVs using predatory journals. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 83(1):12-14.
Potential predatory scholarly open-access journals. N.d. https://beallslist.net/standalone-journals/
Shen, C. & Bjork, B. 2015, Predatory open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine. 13:230
Suber, P. 2004. Praising progress, preserving precision. SPARC Open Access Newsletter No. 77. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-04.htm#FEFF00700072006F00670072006500730073
Young, P. 2009. The serials crisis and open access. A white paper for the Virginia Tech Commission of Research. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/faculty_archives/YoungP/OAwhitepaper.pdf

